What Is a Stablecoin? A Complete Guide to Uses, Risks, and Future Regulations

This document aims to provide a comprehensive and in-depth analysis of stablecoins, positioning them as a critical yet paradoxical financial innovation. As a necessary bridge connecting the traditional financial system with the digital asset economy, stablecoins offer a stable medium of exchange and unit of account. Their potential to revolutionize the global payments landscape is particularly significant, fundamentally challenging the slow and expensive legacy model of correspondent banking with near-instant, low-cost transactions.

However, this innovation is accompanied by substantial risks. These risks stem from the centralization of issuers, uncertainty surrounding the transparency of reserve assets, and the catastrophic failures of experimental models like algorithmic stablecoins.

These vulnerabilities have spurred global regulators into action. The regulatory frameworks being established by major economies such as the United States, Hong Kong, and the European Union are becoming the primary force shaping the industry's future. These frameworks generally favor increased transparency and robust asset reserves for issuers, while inadvertently opening a new front in geopolitical currency competition.

Furthermore, the rise of stablecoins has systemic implications for the traditional financial system. Not only could they lead to deposit outflows from commercial banks, thereby affecting their credit creation capacity, but their issuers have also become significant players in sovereign debt markets, introducing a new variable to global financial stability. This document will delve into the technical architecture, application scenarios, value proposition, and inherent risk matrix of stablecoins, providing stakeholders with the nuanced insights needed to make strategic decisions in this rapidly evolving field.

Building Stability: Definition and Classification of Stablecoins

The creation of stablecoins was intended to solve the problem of intense price volatility inherent in first-generation cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum. This volatility makes them unreliable as a medium of exchange or a store of value. The design goal of stablecoins is to combine the advantages of blockchain technology with the stability of traditional currencies.

A stablecoin is a special type of cryptocurrency designed to peg its value to an external asset, most commonly a major fiat currency like the U.S. dollar. Through this pegging mechanism, stablecoins offer price stability comparable to fiat currency while retaining the benefits of blockchain technology, such as transparency, efficiency, and global accessibility. This dual nature makes them suitable not only for trading and settlement within the cryptocurrency market but also holds great potential for applications in daily payments, cross-border remittances, and value storage. Fundamentally, stablecoins play a crucial infrastructural role, building a bridge that connects the volatile crypto world with the established traditional financial system.

Stablecoins maintain their pegged value through various methods, and these different mechanisms determine their operational models, advantages, and respective inherent risks.

Fiat-Collateralized (Off-Chain Collateral): The Centralized Model Dominating the Market

Mechanism: This is currently the most common type of stablecoin with the largest market share. It operates on the principle that a centralized issuing entity holds one unit of equivalent fiat currency, or highly liquid, low-risk equivalents like short-term government bonds, in its reserves for every stablecoin issued. The core promise of this model is that holders can redeem their stablecoins for the corresponding fiat currency at a 1:1 ratio at any time.

Key Examples: Tether (USDT) and USD Coin (USDC). Together, they account for about 90% of the stablecoin market share.

Advantages: Its operational model is simple and intuitive, similar to a traditional currency board system or a digital bank deposit certificate, making it easy for users to understand and trust. Under normal market conditions, this model has proven to be highly price-stable.

Weaknesses and Risks: The biggest weakness of this model lies in its highly centralized structure, requiring users to place complete trust in the issuing institution. This gives rise to two core risks: first is counterparty risk, where the issuer itself could fail due to mismanagement, fraud, or bankruptcy; second is reserve risk, where the issuer's reserves may be insufficient, non-transparent, or illiquid, making it unable to meet large-scale redemption requests and causing the stablecoin to de-peg.

Crypto-Collateralized (On-Chain Collateral): Decentralization Achieved Through Over-Collateralization

Mechanism: This type of stablecoin is not backed by fiat currency but is generated using other crypto-assets (like Ethereum) stored in on-chain smart contracts as collateral. Due to the high price volatility of the collateral itself, this model employs an "over-collateralization" mechanism to buffer against such fluctuations. For example, a user might need to lock up $200 worth of Ethereum to mint $100 worth of stablecoins.

Key Example: DAI, issued by MakerDAO.

Advantages: Compared to the fiat-collateralized model, the main advantages of this model are greater transparency and decentralization. Since the collateral is locked in a public smart contract, anyone can verify its status at any time, reducing reliance on a single centralized institution.

Weaknesses and Risks: Its main risk comes from the price volatility of the underlying crypto collateral. A sharp drop in the market price of the collateral asset could trigger the smart contract's automatic liquidation mechanism, and if market selling pressure is too great, it could still lead to the stablecoin de-pegging. Additionally, its operational mechanism is more complex for ordinary users.

Commodity-Collateralized: Physical Assets on the Blockchain

Mechanism: This type is similar to the fiat-collateralized model, but its reserve assets are physical commodities like gold or oil. Each token represents ownership of a certain quantity of a physical commodity stored in a vault.

Key Example: Paxos Gold (PAXG), where each PAXG token represents ownership of one troy ounce of gold.

Advantages: It provides users with a convenient way to gain exposure to traditional safe-haven assets (like gold) in the digital asset space, combining the value-storage properties of physical assets with the liquidity of digital tokens.

Weaknesses and Risks: This model also has centralization risks, as users must trust the custodian of the physical commodity. Furthermore, the token's value is directly subject to the market price fluctuations of the underlying commodity.

Algorithmic Stablecoins (Uncollateralized): High-Risk, High-Innovation Frontier Experiments

Mechanism: Algorithmic stablecoins do not rely on any asset collateral. They use pre-written algorithms and smart contracts to automatically adjust the token's circulating supply based on market supply and demand, in order to maintain its price peg to a target (like $1). Some models use a dual-token system, where a more volatile "governance token" or "equity token" is designed to absorb the price fluctuations of the stablecoin.

Key Example (Failed): TerraUSD (UST) and its interaction mechanism with LUNA.

Advantages (in theory): The greatest theoretical advantage is its capital efficiency, as it does not require holding large reserve assets, thus enabling true decentralization and scalability.

Weaknesses and Risks: This model is extremely fragile. Its stability relies entirely on continuous market confidence and the effective operation of arbitrage mechanisms. It is highly susceptible to "bank run"-style panic selling and can easily fall into a so-called "death spiral." The collapse of UST in 2022, which wiped out tens of billions of dollars in market value in a few days, tragically demonstrated the fundamental flaws of this model. Today, algorithmic stablecoins are widely considered a failed experiment and are banned or strictly restricted in many jurisdictions.

The evolutionary path from fiat-collateralized to crypto-collateralized, and then to algorithmic models, clearly reveals a core trade-off triangle in stablecoin design: trust, capital efficiency, and stability. The fiat-collateralized model (like USDT/USDC) prioritizes stability and user intuition by mimicking traditional bank deposit models, but this requires users to have immense trust in the centralized issuer and is capital-inefficient due to the need to lock up huge amounts of reserves. The crypto-collateralized model (like DAI) attempts to solve the centralized trust issue through transparent on-chain collateral, but it sacrifices capital efficiency (through over-collateralization) and introduces new risks from collateral price volatility.

Algorithmic stablecoins (like UST) attempted to achieve the ultimate goal: solving both trust and capital efficiency problems simultaneously. However, their complete failure proved that stability cannot be created out of thin air by code alone; it is fundamentally a balance sheet problem that requires real, robust assets as backing. The reaction from the market and regulators has made it clear that the systemic risks posed by algorithmic models are unacceptable. Therefore, the future development of stablecoins, at least in the medium term, will revolve around collateralized models. The key competition will be between centralized, regulated fiat-collateralized models and decentralized, but more complex, crypto-collateralized models.

Table 1: Comparative Overview of Stablecoin Pegging Mechanisms

Mechanism Type	Key Examples	Pegging Method	Key Advantages	Core Weaknesses/Risks	Degree of Centralization
Fiat-Collateralized	USDT, USDC	1:1 reserve of fiat or equivalent assets held by a centralized issuer.	Simple, intuitive, high price stability.	Counterparty risk, reserve transparency and liquidity risk.	High
Crypto-Collateralized	DAI	Over-collateralization of crypto assets locked in smart contracts.	Decentralized, high on-chain transparency.	Collateral price volatility risk, potential for cascading liquidations.	Low
Commodity-Collateralized	PAXG	Reserves of physical commodities (e.g., gold) held by a centralized custodian.	Provides digital exposure to physical assets.	Centralized custody risk, subject to commodity price fluctuations.	High
Algorithmic Stablecoin	UST (Failed)	Automatically adjusts token supply via algorithm, no physical collateral.	High capital efficiency, theoretically highest degree of decentralization.	Extremely fragile, prone to "death spirals" and confidence collapses.	Variable (Theoretically Low)

Utility Spectrum: Core Applications and Market Impact

The following section moves from theory to practice, detailing how stablecoins are used in the real world and why they have become an indispensable part of the digital asset economy. The widespread application of stablecoins reveals a dual-track adoption model: one track is "crypto-native," focusing on speculation and complex financial engineering, while the other is "real-world utility," focusing on solving practical problems in payments and savings.

The Lingua Franca of the Crypto Economy: Trading, Liquidity, and Hedging

Stablecoins first played the role of a base currency in the cryptocurrency ecosystem. They are the primary medium of exchange on cryptocurrency exchanges. Data shows that over 90% of Bitcoin transactions are settled using stablecoins like USDT or USDC. This greatly reduces the friction and cost of repeatedly converting to traditional fiat currency when trading different crypto assets, making them the universal "base currency pair" for trading thousands of other digital assets.

In addition to being a medium of exchange, stablecoins also act as a "safe haven" asset within the crypto market. During periods of intense market volatility, traders and investors quickly convert their holdings of highly volatile assets like Bitcoin into stablecoins to lock in profits or hedge against risks without completely exiting the crypto ecosystem. This function makes stablecoins an indispensable risk management tool for crypto-native participants.

The Engine of Decentralized Finance (DeFi): Driving Lending and Yield Farming

Stablecoins are the lifeblood of the Decentralized Finance (DeFi) ecosystem. They provide the stable asset necessary for DeFi protocols to conduct predictable lending, trading, and other financial services.

On DeFi lending platforms (like Aave and Compound), users can lend out their stablecoins to earn interest, with yields often higher than those of traditional bank savings accounts. Conversely, users can also borrow stablecoins by collateralizing their other crypto assets to meet liquidity needs.

Furthermore, stablecoins are crucial in the liquidity pools of decentralized exchanges (DEXs). Users can deposit stablecoins (often paired with another stablecoin, like USDC/USDT, to minimize the risk of "impermanent loss") into liquidity pools to support the platform's trading. In return, liquidity providers not only earn a share of the trading fees but also often receive additional rewards in the form of the platform's native token, a practice known as "liquidity mining" or "yield farming." This has given rise to a vibrant market of passive income strategies based on stablecoins, with some projects offering considerable annualized returns. More advanced strategies, like "liquid staking," allow users to release their staked assets (which are already generating yield) in the form of a liquid token, which can then be used elsewhere in DeFi (for example, as collateral to borrow stablecoins), creating multiple layers of stacked returns.

Revolutionizing Global Payments: Cross-Border B2B Transactions and Personal Remittances

Stablecoins offer a faster, cheaper, and more accessible alternative to traditional cross-border payment systems. They bypass the slow and expensive correspondent banking network, enabling transaction settlements in minutes or even seconds, and operate 24/7.

Key use cases include:

• Personal Remittances: Migrant workers can send funds back to their home countries at a very low cost using stablecoins. According to the World Bank, the average fee for traditional remittances is over 6%, while the blockchain network fee for stablecoins can be just a fraction of that, with near-instant settlement.

• B2B Payments: For businesses engaged in import/export trade or needing to pay global freelancers, stablecoins help them manage cash flow more effectively, avoid exchange rate fluctuation risks, and significantly reduce transaction costs.

• Institutional Adoption: Their efficiency advantages have attracted the attention of mainstream financial institutions. Payment giants like Visa and major commercial banks are gradually integrating stablecoins into their payment infrastructure, acknowledging their potential to enhance global payment efficiency.

Broader Economic Use Cases: Combating Inflation and E-commerce Settlement

The application of stablecoins has expanded beyond the crypto world and is beginning to play a role in broader economic activities.

In countries with high inflation and unstable local currencies (such as Argentina, Turkey, and Nigeria), ordinary people are increasingly using US dollar-pegged stablecoins as a store of value to protect their savings from purchasing power erosion. This "dollarization" of personal finance is a major driver of retail adoption of stablecoins in emerging markets.

In the e-commerce sector, online merchants are starting to accept stablecoin payments to achieve faster fund settlement, lower transaction fees (compared to credit card fees that can be as high as 3%), and eliminate the risk of "chargeback fraud," as blockchain transactions are final and irreversible. Major e-commerce platforms like Shopify and WooCommerce now support stablecoin payments through plugins.

The diverse applications of stablecoins reveal a dual-track development model. The initial growth was driven by the "crypto-native" track, a self-referential ecosystem where stablecoins are used to trade other crypto assets, serve as collateral for crypto loans, and earn yields in the crypto world. This track is high-risk, highly innovative, and largely insulated from the traditional economy.

Meanwhile, the "real-world utility" track is emerging, where stablecoins are breaking out of the cryptocurrency bubble to solve real-world financial friction problems. This track is driven by the genuine needs of individuals and businesses facing high remittance fees, currency depreciation, or inefficient payments, directly competing with and disrupting traditional financial services.

These two tracks have distinctly different risk profiles and thus attract different types of regulatory attention. The complexity and opacity of DeFi applications raise concerns about market manipulation and consumer protection. Payment applications, on the other hand, pose a more direct challenge to national monetary sovereignty and financial stability, which is the core reason for the high level of attention from global regulators. The future success of stablecoins will depend on their ability to continue expanding on the "real-world utility" track, which requires clear regulation and market trust—elements that are often in tension with the permissionless spirit championed by the "crypto-native" track.

Value Proposition: A Comparative Analysis of Fund Flow Paths

One of the most compelling advantages of stablecoins is their ability to completely transform how funds move globally. The following section will directly address the user's question about the advantages of stablecoin fund flow paths by providing a side-by-side comparison with the traditional financial system, quantifying their leap in speed, cost, and accessibility. This shift is not just an incremental improvement but a fundamental paradigm shift from a settlement system based on "information" to one based on "value."

The Traditional Path: Efficiency Bottlenecks of Correspondent Banking and the SWIFT System

A traditional international wire transfer is not a direct transfer of funds. It is essentially a process of passing payment instructions between a series of correspondent banks through the Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication (SWIFT) network. This system relies on nostro/vostro accounts that banks hold with each other, and the "movement" of funds is accomplished through a series of debits and credits on these accounts.

This decades-old architecture has inherent efficiency bottlenecks:

• Slow Speed: Due to the involvement of multiple intermediaries, different time zones, and bank operating hours, a cross-border remittance typically takes 2 to 5 business days to finally settle.

• High Cost: Each correspondent bank in the transmission chain charges a fee, leading to high total costs. For B2B payments, fees can range from 1.5% to 2.9%, while the average cost for personal remittances is over 6%.

• Lack of Transparency: Due to the uncertain number of intermediaries and their fee structures, the sender often does not know the exact final amount that will be received or the precise time of arrival when initiating the transaction.

• Limited Accessibility: The system is entirely dependent on traditional banking infrastructure and is limited by banking hours. This excludes over a billion people worldwide who do not have access to banking services.

The Stablecoin Path: Quantifying Advantages in Speed, Cost-Effectiveness, and 24/7 Accessibility

Stablecoin transfers fundamentally change this model. It is no longer about transmitting information about value, but about directly transferring value itself. A stablecoin transfer is a peer-to-peer direct movement of a digital asset from the sender's wallet to the receiver's wallet on the blockchain.

Its advantages can be clearly quantified:

• Speed: Settlement is almost instantaneous, depending on the block confirmation time of different blockchains, usually completed in a few seconds to a few minutes. This is a system that operates 24/7, 365 days a year, unaffected by bank holidays or time zones.

• Cost: Transaction costs are drastically reduced to only the blockchain network's transaction fee (i.e., "gas fee"). On highly efficient blockchains like Solana or Ethereum Layer 2 solutions, this fee is often less than a dollar, or even just a few cents.

• Transparency: All transactions are recorded on a public, immutable distributed ledger, providing complete end-to-end traceability.

• Accessibility: Anyone with a smartphone and an internet connection can create a digital wallet and participate, greatly promoting financial inclusion.

The traditional SWIFT and correspondent banking system is built on a foundation of trusted intermediaries passing messages. The value itself does not move in real-time; rather, the ledgers of trusted parties are updated. Because each step requires trust and reconciliation, the system is inherently slow and expensive. Blockchain-based stablecoins completely dismantle this chain. The token itself is the value, and sending the token is the settlement. Trust is placed in the blockchain's consensus mechanism, not in a series of banks.

This means the challenge posed by stablecoins is not one that banks can address by simply making their systems "faster." It is a fundamental architectural challenge, and banks' most profitable cross-border payment business is at risk of being completely bypassed. This also explains why traditional financial institutions are now scrambling to get involved in the stablecoin space, whether by partnering with issuers or exploring issuing their own, to avoid being left behind in the next wave of global payments.

Case Study: Impact on Emerging Markets and High-Cost Corridors

Latin America is a prime example of stablecoin adoption, driven by high remittance costs, severe currency volatility, and a large unbanked population.

• Data Point: In 2023, remittances to Latin America reached $156 billion.

• Practical Application: Cryptocurrency platforms like Bitso process millions of dollars in remittances each month using USDC on low-cost blockchains.

• Local Adoption: Professionals and freelancers in Argentina and Colombia are widely adopting stablecoins to receive payments from international clients, thereby bypassing high intermediary fees.

• Dual Benefits: In economically unstable countries like Argentina, stablecoins not only provide an efficient payment channel but also serve as a stable store of value against local currency depreciation, offering a dual advantage that traditional finance cannot match.

Table 2: Comparative Analysis of Cross-Border Payment Paths: Traditional Finance vs. Stablecoins

Metric	Traditional System (SWIFT/Correspondent Banking)	Stablecoin System (e.g., USDC on Solana)
Transaction Speed	2-5 business days	Seconds to minutes
Total Cost	B2B: 1.5%-2.9%; Remittances: >6%	Blockchain network fee (often < $0.01)
Operating Hours	Banking hours	24/7/365
Number of Intermediaries	Multiple (sending bank, correspondent banks, receiving bank)	Zero (peer-to-peer)
Transparency/Traceability	Opaque, difficult to track	Fully transparent, on-chain traceability
Accessibility Requirement	Traditional bank account	Smartphone and internet connection

Risk Spectrum: A Comprehensive Analysis of Inherent Concerns

While stablecoins offer unprecedented financial efficiency, they also introduce a full spectrum of risks, from the micro (issuer failure) to the macro (systemic financial instability). The following section will conduct a comprehensive and rigorous analysis of these "disadvantages and hidden worries," revealing the vulnerabilities beneath their polished exterior.

The Issuer's Dilemma: Counterparty, Reserve, and Centralization Risks

This part focuses on the risks inherent in the fiat-collateralized model that dominates the market.

Analysis of the Duopoly: The Business Models and Profitability of Tether (USDT) vs. Circle (USDC)

The core business model of stablecoin issuers is very simple: they take in users' dollars (as a non-interest-bearing liability) and invest these funds in yield-generating assets, primarily U.S. Treasury bills, thereby earning the spread. The success of this model depends on the strategy and transparency of their reserve management.

• Tether (USDT):

  • Strategy: Adopts a more aggressive and less transparent reserve management strategy. Its reserves include not only U.S. Treasuries but also secured loans, corporate bonds, and even highly volatile assets like Bitcoin and gold.

  • Profitability: Due to its diversified and higher-yielding investment portfolio, as well as minimal revenue sharing, Tether is extremely profitable. In the second quarter of 2025 alone, the company reported a staggering profit of $4.9 billion.

  • Risks: The opacity of its reserve composition and a history of regulatory fines have led to a long-term trust crisis. Including volatile assets in its reserves also introduces market risk to its balance sheet.

• Circle (USDC):

  • Strategy: Takes a "compliance-first" approach, placing extreme importance on transparency. Its reserves consist mainly of cash and short-term U.S. Treasuries, with monthly reserve attestations provided by a Big Four accounting firm.

  • Profitability: Due to its conservative investment strategy and a significant revenue-sharing agreement with its key partner, Coinbase, its profitability is far inferior to Tether's.

  • Risks: Its revenue is overly dependent on interest rates, making it extremely vulnerable in a low-interest-rate environment. Additionally, a heavy reliance on banking partners introduces traditional counterparty risk. During the Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) crisis in 2023, Circle disclosed that some of its reserves were held at the bank, which directly caused USDC to temporarily de-peg, highlighting this risk.

Table 3: Comparative Analysis of the Stablecoin Duopoly: Tether (USDT) vs. Circle (USDC)

Metric	Tether (USDT)	Circle (USDC)
Market Share	~60-70%	~20-30%
Issuer HQ/Camp	Hong Kong/Offshore, Non-US Camp	US/Onshore, US Camp
Reserve Composition	Diversified, including Treasuries, secured loans, Bitcoin, gold, etc.	Highly conservative, primarily cash and short-term U.S. Treasuries
Transparency/Audit	Regular attestations, but lacks a full audit from a Big Four firm	Monthly attestations by a Big Four firm, high transparency
Regulatory Status	Offshore regulation, faces more regulatory pressure	Actively seeks and complies with US regulatory requirements
Business Model/Profit Driver	High yields from an aggressive portfolio, minimal revenue sharing	Interest income from a conservative portfolio, significant sharing with Coinbase
Core Vulnerability	Trust risk from lack of reserve transparency	Over-reliance on interest rates and counterparty risk from banking partners

The Centralization Paradox: Asset Freezes, Censorship, and the Betrayal of the Decentralized Spirit

A key and highly controversial capability of centralized stablecoin issuers is their ability to freeze assets in user wallets at the smart contract level. Both Tether and Circle have demonstrated that they actively cooperate with global law enforcement agencies to combat terrorist financing, hacking, and other illegal activities.

While this capability is necessary for regulatory compliance and fighting crime, it directly conflicts with the core values of censorship resistance and financial sovereignty championed in the cryptocurrency space. Critics argue that this centralized control makes these stablecoins functionally no different from Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs), potentially being used for surveillance or improper exercise of power. This has created a deep philosophical and practical divide among users, forming a "centralization paradox": to gain the trust and legitimacy of the traditional world, stablecoins must abandon the most cherished characteristics of the decentralized world.

The Ghost in the Machine: Algorithmic Instability and De-Pegging Events

Forensic Examination of the Collapse: The Terra (UST) and LUNA "Death Spiral"

The collapse of UST in May 2022 is one of the most cautionary events in cryptocurrency history, exposing the fatal flaws of the algorithmic stablecoin model.

• Mechanism: UST was an algorithmic stablecoin whose value was maintained through an arbitrage mechanism with a highly volatile governance token, LUNA. Users could mint 1 UST with $1 worth of LUNA, and vice versa, at any time. The stability of this system was entirely based on market confidence and the continuous participation of arbitrageurs.

• Trigger: The catalyst was a series of large, possibly organized, withdrawals of funds from key liquidity pools, likely a well-planned attack, which caused UST's price to slightly de-peg from its $1 anchor.

• Death Spiral: The minor de-peg quickly triggered mass market panic. Users rushed to redeem their UST for LUNA. According to the mechanism's design, the system was forced to mint a massive amount of LUNA to absorb the sold-off UST, causing LUNA's supply to skyrocket and its price to collapse. LUNA, the supposed backing for UST's value, became worthless, completely destroying market confidence and further exacerbating the run on UST. The issuer's attempt to defend the peg by selling its Bitcoin reserves was not only a drop in the bucket but also intensified the panic across the entire crypto market, ultimately leading to the total market value of UST and LUNA to nearly zero out in a matter of days.

• Aftermath: The collapse wiped out over $40 billion in market value, causing devastating losses for investors worldwide and immediately prompting strict scrutiny of stablecoins by global regulators. It ruthlessly revealed that any financial system built purely on confidence without sufficient asset backing is inherently extremely fragile.

The Regulatory Challenge: Navigating a Global Patchwork of Oversight Frameworks

The emerging global regulatory frameworks are currently the most important force shaping the future of the stablecoin industry, and also constitute its greatest uncertainty risk.

United States: The GENIUS Act and the Pursuit of Federal Clarity

• Framework: The Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US-Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act, signed into law in July 2025, established the first comprehensive federal regulatory framework for payment stablecoins in the United States.

• Core Requirements: The act mandates that issuers must hold 1:1 reserves of high-quality liquid assets (such as cash and short-term Treasuries); limits issuer eligibility to regulated depository institutions or federally licensed non-bank institutions; and requires all issuers to comply with the Bank Secrecy Act's Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and Know Your Customer (KYC) regulations. The act also explicitly excludes compliant payment stablecoins from the definitions of securities or commodities.

• Impact: This act aims to bring long-awaited regulatory certainty to the market, enhance consumer protection, and solidify the dominance of the U.S. dollar in the digital age. It clearly favors transparent and compliant issuers like Circle while putting immense compliance pressure on offshore entities like Tether.

Hong Kong: A New Licensing Regime Designed for a Global Financial Hub

• Framework: The Stablecoin Ordinance, which took effect on August 1, 2025, established a licensing regime managed by the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA).

• Core Requirements: It requires issuers to have a minimum paid-up share capital of HK$25 million; reserves must be 100% backed by high-quality liquid assets; reserve assets must be segregated from the issuer's own assets; and it guarantees holders the right to redeem at par value within one business day. Additionally, there are strict "fit and proper" tests for management. The ordinance stipulates that only licensed issuers can offer stablecoins to retail investors.

• Impact: This move positions Hong Kong as a regulated hub for stablecoin innovation, potentially attracting issuers seeking a clear legal framework in Asia and possibly promoting the development of stablecoins pegged to the Hong Kong dollar or offshore renminbi.

European Union: MiCA's Comprehensive and Strict Framework

• Framework: The Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) Regulation, fully applicable from late 2024, establishes a unified rulebook for the entire European Union.

• Core Requirements: MiCA classifies stablecoins into e-money tokens (EMTs) and asset-referenced tokens (ARTs). It requires issuers to be licensed in any EU member state, maintain full reserves, and publish a detailed white paper.

• Restrictive Measures: The most controversial part of MiCA is its restrictive provisions. To promote the use of the euro in the digital space, it sets a daily transaction volume cap of €200 million for large non-euro-denominated stablecoins (like USDT and USDC). Furthermore, it prohibits issuers from paying interest or offering yields to stablecoin holders, which directly strikes at many DeFi business models. Algorithmic stablecoins are completely banned.

• Impact: MiCA is the most restrictive regulatory framework among major economies. Its design is clearly aimed at protecting the monetary sovereignty of the euro and is likely to lead to major exchanges delisting non-compliant stablecoins for EU users, thereby fundamentally reshaping the European stablecoin market landscape.

Table 4: Global Stablecoin Regulatory Snapshot: A Comparison of US, HK, and EU Frameworks

Regulatory Area	United States (GENIUS Act)	Hong Kong (Stablecoin Ordinance)	European Union (MiCA)
Issuer Licensing	Federally or state-licensed banks or non-bank institutions.	Requires a license from the Hong Kong Monetary Authority.	Requires a license in any EU member state.
Reserve Requirements	100% backed by US dollar cash or short-term Treasuries.	100% backed by high-quality liquid assets.	100% backed by high-quality liquid assets, with a portion held in EU banks.
Rules for Non-Local Currency Stablecoins	Encourages USD stablecoins. Foreign issuers must comply with equivalent regulations.	Regulates all stablecoins issued in or pegged to the Hong Kong dollar.	Sets transaction volume caps for large non-euro stablecoins.
Stance on Yield/Interest	Prohibits payment of interest or yield.	Not explicitly prohibited, but requires disclosure.	Explicitly prohibits paying interest to holders.
Core Strategic Goal	Solidify digital dollar hegemony, provide market clarity.	Become a regulated Asian virtual asset hub.	Protect euro monetary sovereignty, unify market rules.

Systemic Shockwaves: Impact on the Traditional Financial System

The risks of stablecoins are not confined to the crypto world; their expanding scale is having a profound and potentially disruptive impact on the traditional financial system.

The Threat to Commercial Banks: Deposit Outflows and Worsening Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR)

• Mechanism: When a bank customer buys a stablecoin, this transaction on the bank's balance sheet transforms a stable, insured retail deposit into a volatile, uninsured wholesale deposit held in the stablecoin issuer's partner bank account.

• European Central Bank (ECB) Analysis: A document from the European Central Bank explicitly states that this process fundamentally weakens a bank's Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR). Bank A loses a stable retail deposit (which has a lower expected outflow rate in LCR calculations), while Bank B (the issuer's reserve bank) gains a volatile wholesale deposit (with an expected outflow rate as high as 100%). This makes the entire banking system more fragile.

• Systemic Risk: If stablecoins are widely adopted, it could trigger large-scale deposit outflows from the traditional banking system, especially from small and medium-sized banks. This would weaken their credit creation capacity and, in extreme cases, could trigger a systemic liquidity crisis.

Impact on Sovereign Debt Markets: Stablecoins as Unregulated, Systemically Important Participants

• Scale: Stablecoin issuers, particularly Tether, have become massive holders in the U.S. Treasury bill market. Tether's holdings of U.S. Treasuries have surpassed those of sovereign nations like South Korea and Germany.

• Market Impact (BIS Analysis): Research from the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) found that the reserve management behavior of stablecoins can have a substantial impact on Treasury yields. Large inflows into stablecoins depress short-term Treasury yields. More concerningly, this effect is asymmetric: during a run, large outflows would force issuers to sell Treasuries, pushing up yields far more than inflows depress them, which could disrupt the transmission mechanism of central bank monetary policy.

• Paradox: The U.S. GENIUS Act, on one hand, encourages stablecoin issuers to hold U.S. Treasuries to ensure stability, but on the other hand, this creates a new, largely unregulated (at a bank-level) source of potential volatility in the world's most important financial market. A run on a major stablecoin would no longer be just a crypto-sector problem but could evolve into a crisis in the sovereign debt market.

Users, particularly retail and emerging market users, adopt stablecoins for the "stability" and "security" they offer relative to volatile crypto assets or their own national currencies. However, this stability is built on a complex and fragile network that depends on the integrity of the issuer, the quality and liquidity of reserve assets, the robustness of the code, and the collective confidence of the market.

The name "stablecoin" itself creates a dangerous illusion of safety. The collapse of UST and the de-pegging of USDC during the SVB crisis both prove they are not without risk. As Circle's CFO admitted, they are only "relatively" safe. Therefore, there is a huge disconnect between the market's perception of risk (low) and the actual multifaceted risks that exist (high). This cognitive gap is a major source of potential consumer harm and the core motivation for active intervention by global regulators. Regulators are not just regulating a new asset; they are trying to manage user expectations and prevent the inevitable consequences when this illusion of safety shatters.

At the same time, observing the regulatory strategies of different jurisdictions—the US promoting the digital dollar, the EU protecting the digital euro, and Hong Kong creating a regulatory sandbox—reveals that these are not just technical rule-makings. The US GENIUS Act, by requiring reserves to be predominantly in US dollar assets, is effectively outsourcing the expansion of American monetary influence to the private sector, creating new global demand for U.S. Treasuries. The EU's MiCA, by setting caps on non-euro tokens, is a protectionist measure designed to prevent the "dollarization" of its digital economy and foster a native euro ecosystem. Thus, the battle for stablecoin dominance has become a proxy war for future monetary hegemony. The legal frameworks being established today will determine the trajectory of the global economy in the 21st century. The competition between USDT (offshore, non-aligned) and USDC (onshore, US-aligned) is merely the first battle in this new "Great Game."

Conclusion and Strategic Outlook

This document has provided a multi-dimensional analysis of stablecoins, from their innovative technical architecture and wide-ranging applications to their complex interactions with the traditional financial system and profound inherent risks. The conclusion is that stablecoins are both a revolutionary catalyst for financial efficiency and a source of potential systemic risk.

Synthesizing the Duality: Reconciling Unprecedented Innovation with Systemic Risk

The core tension of stablecoins is this: they offer undeniable, order-of-magnitude improvements in financial efficiency, particularly in global payments, but they achieve this by introducing new and significant risks to both users and the global financial system. From the counterparty and reserve risks of fiat-collateralized models to the catastrophic collapse of algorithmic models, and the systemic impact on the banking system and sovereign debt markets, these risks can no longer be ignored. The analysis in this document shows that the era of unrestrained, wild-west experimentation has definitively ended. The future of stablecoins will no longer be driven by pure technological innovation but will be shaped by frameworks of regulation, trust, and risk management.

Future Trajectory: Towards Regulation, Transparency, and Deeper Financial Integration

The future development of stablecoins will proceed along an irreversible path, with the keywords being regulation, transparency, and integration.

• The Inevitability of Regulation: The regulatory frameworks being established by major global economies will become the "new normal" for the industry. This will trigger a "flight to quality," benefiting issuers who are transparent about their reserves, hold high-quality assets, and operate in compliance with regulations.

• Blurring of Lines: The lines between traditional finance (TradFi) and decentralized finance (DeFi) will continue to blur. On one hand, traditional financial institutions will increasingly adopt stablecoin technology to improve efficiency; on the other, stablecoin issuers will be forced to accept strict, bank-like regulation, making them operate more like traditional financial institutions.

• The Geopolitical Dimension: Stablecoins will increasingly become a tool of strategic competition between major currency blocs. The competition between stablecoins pegged to the US dollar, the euro, and even the offshore renminbi will reflect the broader geopolitical balance of power.

Strategic Recommendations for Key Stakeholders

• For Investors:

  • The Necessity of Due Diligence: Investors must conduct extremely rigorous due diligence. The key questions are no longer "Is this a cryptocurrency?" but "Who is the issuer? What are its reserve assets? Under which regulatory framework does it operate?".

  • Risk Assessment: It is crucial to recognize that "stablecoin" does not mean "risk-free." The specific risks of different types of stablecoins, such as the counterparty risk of fiat-collateralized models and the collateral volatility risk of crypto-collateralized models, should be carefully evaluated.

  • Diversification: Diversifying across issuers, jurisdictions, and underlying blockchains is a key strategy for managing risk.

Reference

1. 穩定幣是什麼？有哪些種類？與美國國債的關係?一文看懂Stablecoin的運作 - 口袋證券, https://www.pocket.tw/school/report/SCHOOL/5721/

2. 一文讀懂穩定幣（Stablecoin）：加密貨幣世界的價值錨點 - OSL, https://www.osl.com/hk/academy/article/stablecoins-explained-the-backbone-of-crypto-stability?channel=1OkOre

3. 什麼是穩定幣？ (1) - Coinbase, https://www.coinbase.com/zh-tw/learn/crypto-basics/plp-what-is-a-stablecoin

4. Stablecoin Use Cases: Payments, DeFi, Treasury & More - USDC, https://www.usdc.com/learn/stablecoin-use-cases

5. Stablecoins: The Key to Revolutionizing International Payments - Bitso, https://business.bitso.com/blog/stablecoins-the-key-to-revolutionizing-international-payments

6. Reshaping Cross-Border Payments With Stablecoins, https://paymentsconsulting.com/reshaping-cross-border-payments-with-stablecoins/

7. USDC透明度專文：「安全」是相對而非絕對，肯定存在風險| 鏈新聞 ..., https://abmedia.io/20220706-usdc-trust-transparency-minimizing-risk

8. 美元穩定幣UST 死亡螺旋還有救嗎？算法穩定幣瞬間脫鉤帶給我們的 ..., https://xrex.io/zh/%E7%BE%8E%E5%85%83%E7%A9%A9%E5%AE%9A%E5%B9%A3-ust-%E6%AD%BB%E4%BA%A1%E8%9E%BA%E6%97%8B%E9%82%84%E6%9C%89%E6%95%91%E5%97%8E%EF%BC%9F%E7%AE%97%E6%B3%95%E7%A9%A9%E5%AE%9A%E5%B9%A3%E7%9E%AC%E9%96%93/

9. Terra生態系統的興起與衰落：回顧LUNA和UST的崩盤事件 - 方格子, https://vocus.cc/article/67636ee6fd89780001fbd43a

10. Hong Kong Implements New Regulatory Framework for Stablecoins ..., https://www.sidley.com/en/insights/newsupdates/2025/08/hong-kong-implements-new-regulatory-framework-for-stablecoins

11. How will the GENIUS Act work in the US and impact the world ..., https://www.weforum.org/stories/2025/07/stablecoin-regulation-genius-act/

12. MiCA-Compliant Stablecoins: The New Standard for Regulated Digital Money in Europe, https://moderndiplomacy.eu/2025/07/23/mica-compliant-stablecoins-the-new-standard-for-regulated-digital-money-in-europe/

13. Stabelcoin growth - policy challenges and approaches, https://www.bis.org/publ/bisbull108.pdf

14. Occasional Paper Series - Toss a stablecoin to your banker, https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/scpops/ecb.op353~11120d3428.en.pdf

15. 何謂穩定幣？其運作原理是什麼？ - MoneyHero, https://www.moneyhero.com.hk/zh/investment/blog/%E7%A9%A9%E5%AE%9A%E5%B9%A3%E7%9A%84%E5%AE%9A%E7%BE%A9

16. 穩定幣是什麼？種類與風險懶人包- 2025 最新版｜穩定幣最新排名一次看- Qubic Web3 小教室, https://academy.qubic.app/qubic-web3/what-is-a-stablecoin/

17. 穩定幣- 維基百科，自由嘅百科全書, https://zh-yue.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E7%A9%A9%E5%AE%9A%E5%B9%A3

18. 稳定币是“避险资产”新选项吗？ - 新浪财经, https://finance.sina.com.cn/money/fund/jjsy/2025-06-26/doc-infckanu1780709.shtml?cre=tianyi&mod=pchp&loc=36&r=0&rfunc=20&tj=cxvertical_pc_hp&tr=12

19. 穩定幣- 維基百科，自由的百科全書, https://zh.wikipedia.org/zh-tw/%E7%A8%B3%E5%AE%9A%E5%B8%81

20. 穩定幣是什麼？穩定幣法案、6 大穩定幣、風險分析一次看懂 - 呢喃貓商學院Murmurcats, https://murmurcats.com/what-is-stablecoin/

21. 算法稳定币- Blogs - 廖雪峰的官方网站, https://liaoxuefeng.com/blogs/all/2022-03-07-finance-alg-stablecoin/index.html

22. 穩定幣是下一輪全球金融起漲點？從USDT、USDC嗅出中美角力攻防戰 - 經濟日報, https://money.udn.com/money/story/12040/8910234

23. 什麼是穩定幣？, https://academy.binance.com/zh-TC/articles/what-is-a-stablecoin

24. 穩定幣是什麼？美元穩定幣真的那麼穩嗎？穩定幣風險分析 - 鏈習生, https://chainee.io/what-is-stablecoin/

25. 穩定幣為何脫鉤？ | Binance Academy, https://academy.binance.com/zh-TC/articles/why-do-stablecoins-depeg

26. Stablecoins: Definition, How They Work, and Types - Investopedia, https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/stablecoin.asp

27. 曹辉宁、欧阳辉——稳定币并不稳定：Luna与UST崩盘的教训 - 长江商学院, https://www.ckgsb.com/faculty/news/detail/157/6499.html

28. How MiCA Is Opening New Grounds For Stablecoin Adoption in The EU - Transak, https://transak.com/blog/how-mica-is-opening-new-grounds-for-stablecoin-adoption-in-the-eu

29. The Fed - The stable in stablecoins - Federal Reserve Board, https://www.federalreserve.gov/econres/notes/feds-notes/the-stable-in-stablecoins-20221216.html

30. Stablecoins in DeFi: Ultimate Guide for 2024 [Types, Uses, Risks], https://www.rapidinnovation.io/post/stablecoins-in-defi-everything-you-need-to-know

31. The Important Role of Stablecoins in DeFi - Paxos | Blog, https://www.paxos.com/blog/the-important-role-of-stablecoins-in-defi

32. DeFi Use Cases - Exploring the Potential - XRP Ledger, https://xrpl.org/blog/2025/defi-use-cases-exploring-the-potential

33. 流動性挖礦詳解：如何在DeFi中賺取收益並減少無常損失 - Binance, https://www.binance.com/zh-TC/square/post/15064112201793

34. 穩定幣流動性挖礦指南》七大項目整理，年化報酬上看70% | 動區動趨 ..., https://www.blocktempo.com/7-tips-stablecoins-mining-guide-max-70-4-annualized-income/

35. 加密貨幣De-Fi 進階操作技巧：一文認識流動性挖礦 - OKX, https://www.okx.com/zh-hant/learn/what-is-liquid-staking

36. Remitly launches wallet for cross-border stablecoin payments - Finextra Research, https://www.finextra.com/pressarticle/106610/remitly-launches-wallet-for-cross-border-stablecoin-payments

37. Stablecoins and the Future of Remittances: A Comparative Analysis of Costs, Efficiency, and Economic Impacts across Emerging Markets - FGV Europe, https://www.fgveurope.de/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/Research-Study-Emily-Ekshian.pdf

38. The state of stablecoins in cross-border payments: The 2025 industry primer, https://www.fxcintel.com/research/reports/ct-state-of-stablecoins-cross-border-payments-2025

39. When will you be able to buy a pizza with stablecoin? | Payments Dive, https://www.paymentsdive.com/news/stablecoins-cryptocurrency-digital-assets-payments/756758/

40. 全球比特幣監管大不同！整理7大地區加密監管現狀，亞洲最多元？ - 加密城市, https://www.cryptocity.tw/news/overview-of-global-bitcoin-regulation-landscape

41. How does Circle make money from the surge in stablecoins? - 富途牛牛, https://www.futunn.com/en/learn/detail-how-does-circle-make-money-from-the-surge-in-stablecoins-89451-250667019

42. The most profitable business in the world - Mauldin Economics, https://www.mauldineconomics.com/editorial/the-most-profitable-business-in-the-world

43. Stablecoin surge: Reserve-backed cryptocurrencies are on the rise | World Economic Forum, https://www.weforum.org/stories/2025/03/stablecoins-cryptocurrency-on-rise-financial-systems/

44. Stablecoins 101: Behind crypto's most popular asset - Chainalysis, https://www.chainalysis.com/blog/stablecoins-most-popular-asset/

45. Analysis: 98% of Circle's Revenue Comes from Reserve Asset Income, Facing Potential Market Competition from Large Institutions | Bitget News, https://www.bitget.com/news/detail/12560604804875

46. How Tether and Circle Really Make Money Invisible 13 Billion Dollar Printing Machine - read in the blog of the company COREDO, https://coredo.eu/how-tether-and-circle-really-make-money-invisible-13-billion-dollar-printing-machine/

47. The Stablecoin Comparison of Giants: A Circle and Tether ..., https://chavanette.com/blog/the-stablecoin-comparison-of-giants-circle-and-tether/

48. Tether made $5.2B in 2024: Here's how stablecoins make money - Cointelegraph, https://cointelegraph.com/explained/tether-made-52b-in-2024-heres-how-stablecoins-make-money

49. How Tether Made $4.9 Billion in Three Months While Buying More ..., https://coincentral.com/how-tether-made-4-9-billion-in-three-months-while-buying-more-us-debt-than-south-korea/

50. Tether Issues $20B in USD₮ YTD, Becomes One of Largest U.S. Debt Holders with $127B in Treasuries, Net Profit ~$4.9B in Q2 2025 Attestation Report, https://tether.io/news/tether-issues-20b-in-usdt-ytd-becomes-one-of-largest-u-s-debt-holders-with-127b-in-treasuries-net-profit-4-9b-in-q2-2025-attestation-report/

51. Circle S-1 and the future of money - Fintech Ruminations, https://fintechruminations.com/2025/05/20/circle-s-1-and-the-future-of-money/

52. Tether Freeze Raises Stablecoin Centralization Concerns - PaymentsJournal, https://www.paymentsjournal.com/tether-freeze-raises-stablecoin-centralization-concerns/

53. Tether Acknowledged by U.S. Authorities for Freezing $1.6M ..., https://tether.io/news/tether-acknowledged-by-u-s-authorities-for-freezing-1-6m-connected-to-terrorism-financing/

54. Tether freezes $85k in stolen usdt, raising new questions about ..., https://cointelegraph.com/news/stablecoin-cbdc-tether-funds-freeze-decentralization-debate

55. 算法稳定币UST暴雷Luna从90美元跌至0.05美元加密货币的“血雨腥风”时刻已来到 - 财联社, https://m.cls.cn/depth/1012919

56. United States: The GENIUS Act — A new federal framework for stablecoin issuers, custodians, and banks - Global Compliance News, https://www.globalcompliancenews.com/2025/07/30/https-insightplus-bakermckenzie-com-bm-technology-media-telecommunications_1-united-states-the-genius-act-a-new-federal-framework-for-stablecoin-issuers-custodians-and-banks_07252025/

57. The GENIUS Act of 2025 Stablecoin Legislation Adopted in the US - Latham & Watkins LLP, https://www.lw.com/en/insights/the-genius-act-of-2025-stablecoin-legislation-adopted-in-the-us

58. GENIUS & CLARITY Acts Reshape U.S. Crypto Regulation, https://natlawreview.com/article/update-2025-us-stablecoin-legislation

59. New Federal Regulatory Regime Provides Foundation for Financial Institutions to be Stablecoin Issuers and Accept Cryptocurrency Payments | Buchalter - JD Supra, https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/new-federal-regulatory-regime-provides-9966994/

60. Hong Kong's stablecoin regulations unveiled: Bill passed and draft ..., https://www.reedsmith.com/en/perspectives/2025/07/hong-kongs-stablecoin-regulations-unveiled-bill-passed-licensee-guidelines

61. Hong Kong's Stablecoin Bill: Key Amendments and Next Steps Following Legislative Passage | Insights | Mayer Brown, https://www.mayerbrown.com/en/insights/publications/2025/07/hong-kongs-stablecoin-bill-key-amendments-and-next-steps-following-legislative-passage

62. Hong Kong's new stablecoin licensing and regulatory regime - Davis Polk, https://www.davispolk.com/insights/client-update/hong-kongs-new-stablecoin-licensing-and-regulatory-regime

63. Hong Kong Stablecoin Ordinance Takes Effect August 2025 | Morgan Lewis, https://www.morganlewis.com/pubs/2025/06/hong-kongs-stablecoins-ordinance-to-take-effect-august-1-an-overview-of-the-regulatory-framework

64. Hong Kong's Stablecoin Regime Comes Into View | Global Fintech & Digital Assets Blog, https://www.fintechanddigitalassets.com/2025/07/hong-kongs-stablecoin-regime-comes-into-view/

65. 萬字詳述穩定幣賽道：模式＆執行原理，香港Stablecoin有發展潛力嗎？ | 動區動趨-最具影響力的區塊鏈新聞媒體, https://www.blocktempo.com/discuss-stablecoin-model-execute-and-trend/

66. Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA), https://www.esma.europa.eu/esmas-activities/digital-finance-and-innovation/markets-crypto-assets-regulation-mica

67. Regulating crypto-assets in Europe: Practical guide to MiCA | Global law firm, https://www.nortonrosefulbright.com/en/knowledge/publications/2cec201e/regulating-crypto-assets-in-europe-practical-guide-to-mica

68. The EU's crypto regulation MiCA is now fully applicable - Walkers Global, https://www.walkersglobal.com/Insights/2025/01/The-EUs-crypto-regulation-MiCA-is-now-fully-applicable

69. The EU's Markets in Crypto-Assets MiCA Regulation — a status update - Hogan Lovells, https://www.hoganlovells.com/en/publications/the-eus-markets-in-crypto-assets-mica-regulation-a-status-update

70. Stablecoins: Growth Potential and Impact on Banking - Federal Reserve Board, https://www.federalreserve.gov/econres/ifdp/files/ifdp1334.pdf

71. Tether Becomes 18th Largest Holder of U.S. Treasuries With $127 Billion - CryptoDnes.bg, https://cryptodnes.bg/en/tether-becomes-18th-largest-holder-of-u-s-treasuries-with-127-billion/

72. New BIS report raises concerns with stablecoins - ICBA, https://www.icba.org/newsroom/news-and-articles/2025/06/25/new-bis-report-raises-concerns-with-stablecoins

73. 穩定幣是什麼？從穩定幣法案到RWA全解析 - 富途證券, https://www.futuhk.com/blog/detail-what-is-stablecoin-88-250638001